This ruling dismisses a complaint on the basis that the complainant attempted to claim a complementary VR headset twice for a single purchase.
This ruling dismisses a complaint on the basis that the complainant attempted to claim a complementary VR headset twice for a single purchase.
You do not yet have access to the full content
of this ruling.
You will need to subscribe to view rulings that are more than 30 days old.
Subscribe with us
27Jul2016
MATILDA’S ONLINE SEX SHOP / T GAVIN / 2016-3893F
The word "sex" and references to a sex shop are the topic of this ruling.
More info
1Aug2016
CHATEAU GATEAUX CAKES / J ALLISON / 2016-3628F
The claim "... without the use of artificial pre-mixes, additives, colourants or preservatives ..." comes under the spotlight in this matter.
More info